Cypress Perform

Home > Design Support > Cypress Developer CommunityTM > Cypress Forums > PSoC® Software > PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

Bookmark and Share
Cypress Developer CommunityTM
Forums | Videos | Blogs | Training | Rewards Program | Community Components



PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status
Moderator:
JFMD

Post Reply
Follow this topic



PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

LookAtSystemSolutions posted on 30 Dec 2011 12:19 PM PST
Top Contributor
31 Forum Posts

I just read the article about "HW/SW co-development (with finally some emphasis on software)" written by Mark Saunders from Cypress. Nicely done!

Mark is using a PSoC 5 and on page 3 / figure 4 he refers to CAN implementation. Then I checked CAN component in a sample project and was surprised by an "obsolete" watermark.

Can somebody from Cypress (Mark?) can shed some light into the CAN mystery?

 




Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

kmmankad posted on 30 Dec 2011 06:10 PM PST
Top Contributor
268 Forum Posts

 Hey,nice article..thanks for the link!



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

hli posted on 31 Dec 2011 05:06 AM PST
Top Contributor
675 Forum Posts

The CAN component has been removed in the production silicon of PSoC5. So the article might be based on the ES1 prototypes.



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

Bob Marlowe posted on 31 Dec 2011 05:29 AM PST
Top Contributor
1768 Forum Posts

Oh, what was the reason for that decision? Licences? Issues?? Prices???

CAN is (here in europe) widely used and it is a must in ever truck and truck-trailer (ISO 11898). 

Bob



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

hli posted on 01 Jan 2012 12:35 PM PST
Top Contributor
675 Forum Posts

As far as I understood there were hardware problems which could not be corrected in time. So the CAN component would not have been reliable enough. Same happend to the SAR ADCS (speed reduced, and some constraints added) and the boost converter. The component are avilable with the old Creator 1.0 and ES1 revisions of the chips. But I havent used CAN on them, so I cannot comment on the issues.



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

yfs posted on 03 Jan 2012 08:47 AM PST
Cypress Employee
77 Forum Posts

I didn't know that article had been published yet! Glad you enjoyed it.

Unfortunately, we had to remove CAN from the PSoC 5 devices we are releasing right now because the implementation failed a certification test and we could not work around the problem. My article was written before I knew about that - sorry for the mis-information.

We're working on new chips right now that will have CAN but, for now, it is not available on PSoC 5.

-- Mark.

 



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

Bob Marlowe posted on 03 Jan 2012 10:03 AM PST
Top Contributor
1768 Forum Posts

Thank you, glad to hear that!

Bob



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

Rocketmagnet posted on 05 Jun 2012 03:19 AM PST
Top Contributor
91 Forum Posts

Have you thought of trying to implement UDB based CAN? This would be a potential work-around. It would also mean being able to have dual-CAN on devices when they eventually get working CAN.



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

ole posted on 02 Jul 2012 02:15 AM PST
Top Contributor
26 Forum Posts
hli posted on 01 Jan 2012 12:35 PM PST
Top Contributor
111 Forum Posts
 
 

As far as I understood there were hardware problems which could not be corrected in time. So the CAN component would not have been reliable enough. Same happend to the SAR ADCS (speed reduced, and some constraints added) and the boost converter. The component are avilable with the old Creator 1.0 and ES1 revisions of the chips. But I havent used CAN on them, so I cannot comment on the issues.

---------------------------------

From where do you have this information? I wasn't able to find them.

 



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

hli posted on 02 Jul 2012 01:34 PM PST
Top Contributor
675 Forum Posts

This was more about the SAR ADC than the CAN component. Both were mentioned in another thread, but I cannot find it right now. But yfs confirmed the CAN problems.



Re: PSoC 5 EETIMES article and CAN status

hli posted on 11 Jul 2012 12:06 PM PST
Top Contributor
675 Forum Posts

Funny thing - i just noticed that the thread in question was actually this one :) So just scroll up to yfs' comment.






ALL CONTENT AND MATERIALS ON THIS SITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS". CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR AND ITS RESPECTIVE SUPPLIERS MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE SUITABILITY OF THESE MATERIALS FOR ANY PURPOSE AND DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS WITH REGARD TO THESE MATERIALS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT OF ANY THIRD PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. NO LICENSE, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, IS GRANTED BY CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR. USE OF THE INFORMATION ON THIS SITE MAY REQUIRE A LICENSE FROM A THIRD PARTY, OR A LICENSE FROM CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR.

Content on this site may contain or be subject to specific guidelines or limitations on use. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Terms and Conditions of the site; third parties using this content agree to abide by any limitations or guidelines and to comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site. Cypress Semiconductor and its suppliers reserve the right to make corrections, deletions, modifications, enhancements, improvements and other changes to the content and materials, its products, programs and services at any time or to move or discontinue any content, products, programs, or services without notice.

Spec No: None; Sunset Owner: GRAA; Secondary Owner: RAIK; Sunset Date: 01/01/20